Delete ai_agent_master_prompt_for_building_modern_git_platform.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,741 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
# MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PROMPT
|
|
||||||
## Building a Modern Git Platform with CI/CD + GitOps + Operational UX
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
You are an elite senior staff engineer, platform architect, DevOps architect, distributed systems engineer, and product UX engineer.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
You are tasked with designing and implementing a next-generation self-hosted Git platform.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This platform exists in the category of:
|
|
||||||
- GitHub
|
|
||||||
- GitLab
|
|
||||||
- Forgejo
|
|
||||||
- Gitea
|
|
||||||
- Bitbucket
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
BUT:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
You must NOT merely clone existing platforms.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The goal is to create:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> a modern developer operations platform
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
that deeply integrates:
|
|
||||||
- Git hosting
|
|
||||||
- pull requests
|
|
||||||
- CI/CD
|
|
||||||
- GitOps
|
|
||||||
- deployments
|
|
||||||
- environments
|
|
||||||
- observability
|
|
||||||
- security
|
|
||||||
- operational awareness
|
|
||||||
- developer productivity
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The platform should feel:
|
|
||||||
- fast
|
|
||||||
- operational
|
|
||||||
- developer-first
|
|
||||||
- low cognitive load
|
|
||||||
- modern
|
|
||||||
- reliable
|
|
||||||
- modular
|
|
||||||
- keyboard-first
|
|
||||||
- context-aware
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The product philosophy is:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> repositories are operational systems
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
NOT:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> collections of files.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
HIGH LEVEL PRODUCT GOALS
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The platform should optimize for:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- immediate situational awareness
|
|
||||||
- workflow continuity
|
|
||||||
- deployment visibility
|
|
||||||
- operational clarity
|
|
||||||
- reliability
|
|
||||||
- developer flow
|
|
||||||
- observability
|
|
||||||
- intelligent automation
|
|
||||||
- security by default
|
|
||||||
- excellent UX
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Users should always be able to answer:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- what changed?
|
|
||||||
- what failed?
|
|
||||||
- what deployed?
|
|
||||||
- what is unhealthy?
|
|
||||||
- what needs my attention?
|
|
||||||
- what environments are affected?
|
|
||||||
- what should I review next?
|
|
||||||
- what caused this incident?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
without navigating deeply.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
CORE PRODUCT PRINCIPLES
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. UX FIRST
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Most Git platforms prioritize functionality over usability.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This platform must prioritize:
|
|
||||||
- readability
|
|
||||||
- discoverability
|
|
||||||
- contextual awareness
|
|
||||||
- progressive disclosure
|
|
||||||
- speed
|
|
||||||
- low noise
|
|
||||||
- operational understanding
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Avoid:
|
|
||||||
- tab overload
|
|
||||||
- enterprise clutter
|
|
||||||
- giant forms
|
|
||||||
- notification spam
|
|
||||||
- YAML-centric UX
|
|
||||||
- log-centric UX
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The system should feel:
|
|
||||||
- intentional
|
|
||||||
- calm
|
|
||||||
- efficient
|
|
||||||
- operationally intelligent
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
--------------------------------------------------
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
2. OPERATIONAL AWARENESS
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The platform must continuously surface:
|
|
||||||
- failing pipelines
|
|
||||||
- deployment health
|
|
||||||
- environment drift
|
|
||||||
- flaky tests
|
|
||||||
- security issues
|
|
||||||
- review bottlenecks
|
|
||||||
- dependency risks
|
|
||||||
- deployment risks
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This information should appear naturally throughout the UI.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
--------------------------------------------------
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
3. REPOSITORIES ARE RUNTIME SYSTEMS
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The repository page should not simply display files.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
It should display:
|
|
||||||
- deployments
|
|
||||||
- environments
|
|
||||||
- active PRs
|
|
||||||
- operational health
|
|
||||||
- timelines
|
|
||||||
- incidents
|
|
||||||
- ownership
|
|
||||||
- risk
|
|
||||||
- observability
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The file tree is secondary.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
--------------------------------------------------
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
4. GITOPS IS FIRST CLASS
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Git should become:
|
|
||||||
- source of truth
|
|
||||||
- deployment history
|
|
||||||
- environment state definition
|
|
||||||
- rollback system
|
|
||||||
- audit log
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The system must support:
|
|
||||||
- reconciliation
|
|
||||||
- drift detection
|
|
||||||
- declarative environments
|
|
||||||
- promotion workflows
|
|
||||||
- rollback visualization
|
|
||||||
- environment topology
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
--------------------------------------------------
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
5. RELIABILITY IS A PRIMARY FEATURE
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The platform should optimize for:
|
|
||||||
- deterministic execution
|
|
||||||
- idempotency
|
|
||||||
- isolation
|
|
||||||
- resilience
|
|
||||||
- queue durability
|
|
||||||
- observability
|
|
||||||
- safe rollbacks
|
|
||||||
- fault tolerance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
ARCHITECTURE REQUIREMENTS
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Design the platform using modular services.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Suggested architecture:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```txt
|
|
||||||
Platform
|
|
||||||
├── API Gateway
|
|
||||||
├── Auth Service
|
|
||||||
├── Repository Service
|
|
||||||
├── Pull Request Service
|
|
||||||
├── Issue Service
|
|
||||||
├── Event Bus
|
|
||||||
├── CI Orchestrator
|
|
||||||
├── Runner Manager
|
|
||||||
├── Artifact Registry
|
|
||||||
├── Package Registry
|
|
||||||
├── Deployment Engine
|
|
||||||
├── GitOps Controller
|
|
||||||
├── Environment Service
|
|
||||||
├── Secret Manager
|
|
||||||
├── Notification Service
|
|
||||||
├── Search Service
|
|
||||||
├── Observability Layer
|
|
||||||
├── Metrics Service
|
|
||||||
├── Audit Service
|
|
||||||
└── Web Frontend
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
EVENT DRIVEN ARCHITECTURE
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The platform should be event-driven.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Everything emits events.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Examples:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```txt
|
|
||||||
repo.created
|
|
||||||
push.created
|
|
||||||
pr.opened
|
|
||||||
review.requested
|
|
||||||
pipeline.started
|
|
||||||
pipeline.failed
|
|
||||||
artifact.published
|
|
||||||
deployment.started
|
|
||||||
deployment.failed
|
|
||||||
environment.drift_detected
|
|
||||||
incident.created
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Requirements:
|
|
||||||
- durable events
|
|
||||||
- replay support
|
|
||||||
- auditability
|
|
||||||
- timeline reconstruction
|
|
||||||
- reactive UI updates
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Recommended technologies:
|
|
||||||
- NATS
|
|
||||||
- Kafka
|
|
||||||
- RabbitMQ
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Prefer NATS initially for simplicity.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
CI/CD SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The CI/CD system must support:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- DAG pipelines
|
|
||||||
- matrix builds
|
|
||||||
- reusable workflows
|
|
||||||
- workflow templates
|
|
||||||
- conditional execution
|
|
||||||
- parallel execution
|
|
||||||
- artifacts
|
|
||||||
- caches
|
|
||||||
- retries
|
|
||||||
- concurrency controls
|
|
||||||
- cancellation
|
|
||||||
- pipeline graphs
|
|
||||||
- environment promotion
|
|
||||||
- rollback support
|
|
||||||
- preview environments
|
|
||||||
- flaky test detection
|
|
||||||
- deployment visualization
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The orchestrator should:
|
|
||||||
- schedule
|
|
||||||
- coordinate
|
|
||||||
- monitor
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
NOT directly execute jobs.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
RUNNER SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Runners should:
|
|
||||||
- be ephemeral
|
|
||||||
- isolated
|
|
||||||
- disposable
|
|
||||||
- reproducible
|
|
||||||
- stateless
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Support execution backends:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. Docker containers
|
|
||||||
2. Kubernetes jobs
|
|
||||||
3. Firecracker microVMs
|
|
||||||
4. Bare metal runners
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Security is critical.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Forked PRs must never automatically receive secrets.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
SECRET MANAGEMENT
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Implement scoped secret management.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Secret hierarchy:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```txt
|
|
||||||
Global
|
|
||||||
→ Organization
|
|
||||||
→ Repository
|
|
||||||
→ Environment
|
|
||||||
→ Runtime ephemeral injection
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Support:
|
|
||||||
- Vault
|
|
||||||
- OIDC federation
|
|
||||||
- cloud secret providers
|
|
||||||
- encrypted secret storage
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Secrets must:
|
|
||||||
- never leak to logs
|
|
||||||
- be masked automatically
|
|
||||||
- support audit trails
|
|
||||||
- support rotation
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
ARTIFACT + PACKAGE MANAGEMENT
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Implement:
|
|
||||||
- build artifact storage
|
|
||||||
- OCI registry
|
|
||||||
- package registries
|
|
||||||
- retention policies
|
|
||||||
- artifact provenance
|
|
||||||
- signing support
|
|
||||||
- SBOM support
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Support:
|
|
||||||
- container images
|
|
||||||
- npm
|
|
||||||
- cargo
|
|
||||||
- pip
|
|
||||||
- maven
|
|
||||||
- generic artifacts
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
GITOPS REQUIREMENTS
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
GitOps must be deeply integrated.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Support:
|
|
||||||
- reconciliation loops
|
|
||||||
- drift detection
|
|
||||||
- sync visualization
|
|
||||||
- environment topology
|
|
||||||
- deployment promotion
|
|
||||||
- rollback flows
|
|
||||||
- canary releases
|
|
||||||
- blue/green deployments
|
|
||||||
- environment history
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The UI should make GitOps understandable.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Avoid overwhelming Kubernetes-centric UX.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
DATABASE + STORAGE DESIGN
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Separate:
|
|
||||||
- application code
|
|
||||||
- repository storage
|
|
||||||
- artifacts
|
|
||||||
- caches
|
|
||||||
- logs
|
|
||||||
- uploads
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Repository storage should NOT exist in the app repository.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Recommended:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```txt
|
|
||||||
/data/repos
|
|
||||||
/data/artifacts
|
|
||||||
/data/cache
|
|
||||||
/data/uploads
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Repository storage is runtime instance data.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Treat it like:
|
|
||||||
- database files
|
|
||||||
- object storage
|
|
||||||
- runtime state
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
DASHBOARD REQUIREMENTS
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The dashboard should behave like:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> an operational command center
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
NOT:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> a repository list.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Include:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. Attention Required
|
|
||||||
- failing pipelines
|
|
||||||
- stale PRs
|
|
||||||
- security alerts
|
|
||||||
- deployment failures
|
|
||||||
- environment drift
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
2. Active Workspaces
|
|
||||||
- active repos
|
|
||||||
- active branches
|
|
||||||
- assigned reviews
|
|
||||||
- recent deployments
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
3. Team Activity
|
|
||||||
- merges
|
|
||||||
- releases
|
|
||||||
- deployments
|
|
||||||
- incidents
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
4. CI/CD Overview
|
|
||||||
- pipeline health
|
|
||||||
- queue health
|
|
||||||
- flaky tests
|
|
||||||
- deployment status
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
5. Review Dashboard
|
|
||||||
- pending reviews
|
|
||||||
- high risk PRs
|
|
||||||
- stale reviews
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
6. Security Overview
|
|
||||||
- dependency vulnerabilities
|
|
||||||
- secret leaks
|
|
||||||
- suspicious pushes
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
REPOSITORY PAGE REQUIREMENTS
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The repository page must feel operational.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Top area should include:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```txt
|
|
||||||
Repo Name
|
|
||||||
Production: Healthy
|
|
||||||
CI: Passing
|
|
||||||
Deployments: 3 active
|
|
||||||
Risk: Medium
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The page should include:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- active PRs
|
|
||||||
- deployments
|
|
||||||
- environments
|
|
||||||
- repository health
|
|
||||||
- security alerts
|
|
||||||
- ownership
|
|
||||||
- recent activity
|
|
||||||
- operational timeline
|
|
||||||
- preview environments
|
|
||||||
- CI/CD overview
|
|
||||||
- deployment history
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The README should not dominate the page.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
UNIFIED OPERATIONAL TIMELINE
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Implement a unified timeline merging:
|
|
||||||
- commits
|
|
||||||
- deployments
|
|
||||||
- incidents
|
|
||||||
- rollbacks
|
|
||||||
- CI failures
|
|
||||||
- security events
|
|
||||||
- alerts
|
|
||||||
- releases
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This is one of the most important features.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Users should easily answer:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> what changed before things broke?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
PIPELINE UX REQUIREMENTS
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Pipelines should be visual DAGs.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Support:
|
|
||||||
- dependency visualization
|
|
||||||
- execution timing
|
|
||||||
- bottleneck detection
|
|
||||||
- retry controls
|
|
||||||
- artifact visibility
|
|
||||||
- live execution state
|
|
||||||
- grouped logs
|
|
||||||
- semantic errors
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Logs should support:
|
|
||||||
- filtering
|
|
||||||
- collapsing
|
|
||||||
- syntax highlighting
|
|
||||||
- structured parsing
|
|
||||||
- AI summarization
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
DEPLOYMENT UX REQUIREMENTS
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Deployments must feel first-class.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Each environment should expose:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```txt
|
|
||||||
Production
|
|
||||||
Healthy
|
|
||||||
v1.4.2
|
|
||||||
3 pods
|
|
||||||
0.1% errors
|
|
||||||
Last deploy 14m ago
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Support:
|
|
||||||
- rollback
|
|
||||||
- traffic shifting
|
|
||||||
- canary visibility
|
|
||||||
- deployment timelines
|
|
||||||
- release notes
|
|
||||||
- environment logs
|
|
||||||
- health checks
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
COMMAND PALETTE REQUIREMENTS
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Implement a global command palette.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Inspired by:
|
|
||||||
- VS Code
|
|
||||||
- Raycast
|
|
||||||
- Linear
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Examples:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```txt
|
|
||||||
/retry failed jobs
|
|
||||||
/deploy staging
|
|
||||||
/open logs
|
|
||||||
/review next
|
|
||||||
/show flaky tests
|
|
||||||
/open production incidents
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Keyboard-first navigation is critical.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
AI-ASSISTED FEATURES
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Implement optional AI-assisted operational tooling.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Examples:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- failure diagnosis
|
|
||||||
- flaky test detection
|
|
||||||
- architecture summaries
|
|
||||||
- impact analysis
|
|
||||||
- deployment risk scoring
|
|
||||||
- review summaries
|
|
||||||
- onboarding explanations
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Example:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```txt
|
|
||||||
Likely failure cause:
|
|
||||||
Database migration introduced lock contention.
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
OBSERVABILITY REQUIREMENTS
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Integrate:
|
|
||||||
- metrics
|
|
||||||
- traces
|
|
||||||
- logs
|
|
||||||
- deployment state
|
|
||||||
- incident state
|
|
||||||
- service topology
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Do not isolate observability into external systems.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Expose operational health directly in repository pages.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
RELIABILITY REQUIREMENTS
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Implement:
|
|
||||||
- durable queues
|
|
||||||
- retries
|
|
||||||
- dead-letter queues
|
|
||||||
- resumable pipelines
|
|
||||||
- distributed scheduling
|
|
||||||
- concurrency controls
|
|
||||||
- checkpointing
|
|
||||||
- idempotent operations
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The platform should survive:
|
|
||||||
- runner crashes
|
|
||||||
- orchestrator crashes
|
|
||||||
- network partitions
|
|
||||||
- deployment interruptions
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Implement:
|
|
||||||
- signed artifacts
|
|
||||||
- provenance verification
|
|
||||||
- branch protections
|
|
||||||
- permission scopes
|
|
||||||
- audit logging
|
|
||||||
- secret scanning
|
|
||||||
- dependency scanning
|
|
||||||
- runner isolation
|
|
||||||
- sandboxing
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Support:
|
|
||||||
- Sigstore
|
|
||||||
- Cosign
|
|
||||||
- SLSA concepts
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
UI/UX DESIGN LANGUAGE
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The UI should feel:
|
|
||||||
- modern
|
|
||||||
- minimal
|
|
||||||
- operational
|
|
||||||
- clean
|
|
||||||
- responsive
|
|
||||||
- keyboard-first
|
|
||||||
- information dense but calm
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Visual inspirations:
|
|
||||||
- Linear
|
|
||||||
- Datadog
|
|
||||||
- Grafana
|
|
||||||
- Raycast
|
|
||||||
- Arc Browser
|
|
||||||
- VS Code
|
|
||||||
- modern observability dashboards
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Avoid:
|
|
||||||
- clutter
|
|
||||||
- giant tables
|
|
||||||
- excessive modal workflows
|
|
||||||
- deeply nested navigation
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
IMPLEMENTATION EXPECTATIONS
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
You should:
|
|
||||||
- think deeply about architecture
|
|
||||||
- optimize for maintainability
|
|
||||||
- optimize for extensibility
|
|
||||||
- prioritize UX heavily
|
|
||||||
- prioritize reliability heavily
|
|
||||||
- explain tradeoffs
|
|
||||||
- avoid overengineering early
|
|
||||||
- support future scalability
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
You should continuously ask:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- does this reduce cognitive load?
|
|
||||||
- does this improve operational awareness?
|
|
||||||
- does this improve developer flow?
|
|
||||||
- does this improve reliability?
|
|
||||||
- does this make debugging easier?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
DELIVERABLES
|
|
||||||
==================================================
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
When implementing features:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Provide:
|
|
||||||
- architecture reasoning
|
|
||||||
- schema design
|
|
||||||
- API design
|
|
||||||
- event definitions
|
|
||||||
- service boundaries
|
|
||||||
- UI mockups
|
|
||||||
- workflow diagrams
|
|
||||||
- UX rationale
|
|
||||||
- security implications
|
|
||||||
- scaling considerations
|
|
||||||
- operational implications
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Always optimize for:
|
|
||||||
- clarity
|
|
||||||
- reliability
|
|
||||||
- developer experience
|
|
||||||
- operational intelligence
|
|
||||||
- future extensibility
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The platform should ultimately feel like:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> a unified operating system for software delivery
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
rather than:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
> a Git repository viewer with CI attached.
|
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user